The principle of legat focus within The scope of nuclear liability - Comparative study -

Authors

  • Dr. Nisreen Ghanem Hanoun College of Law, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq

Keywords:

- Nuclear. - Nuclear accident. - Legal responsibility.

Abstract

Despite the shocking substantive basis on which the responsibility of the nuclear exploiter is based, the work of the general rules of liability owed in respect of a nuclear accident may lead to the possibility of multiple liability for such an accident, but this responsibility is better to be concentrated in the person of the nuclear exploiter. The exploiter of third parties with the compensation he has provided, even if the latter is responsible for the accident in accordance with the general rules.

 

References

Firstly. Arabic sources:

- Dr. Jamal Mahmoud Al-Kurdi, The Competent Court and the Applicable Law Concerning Liability Claims and Compensation for the Damages of Transboundary Environmental Pollution, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabi, Cairo, 2003.

- Dr. Mohamed Hassanein Abdel-Al, The Legal System of Civil Liability in the Nuclear Field, A Comparative Study, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, 2008.

- Dr. Muhammad Rabih Fath al-Bab, The Civil Responsibility of the State for the Damages of Nuclear Radioactive Pollution, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, Cairo, without a year of publication.

- Dr. Mahmoud Shukri Sorour, Insurance Against Technological Risks, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, Cairo, 1986.

- Dr. Neamat Mohamed, The Effectiveness of International Protection from the Damages of the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, Arab Renaissance House, Egypt, 2009.

secondly. Foreign sources:

- Belser (W.E), L'assurance des risqué atomiques at quelques-uns deproblemes, quelle pose, 1961.

- Camier (M.C), responsibility and assurance of risks at omique dans europeens, these / Dijon, 1960.

- Debieux, la civil responsabilite des exploitants d'installations nucleaives et Sa couverture, these suisse, 1987.

- Derpimoz (J), Quelques problemes poses par le droit de la responsabilite nucleaire, 1974.

- Gautron (R), La response Sabilite, du constructeur, de centrales uncleaire, Paris, 1965.

- Herbert (J), The Responsibility of Civil au Sensitive Droit Uncle, Paris, 1962.

- Jestaz et sigaudy, Energie Nucleaire, Encyclopedie Juridique, Dallez, 1984.

- Klarr (H), Current Problems of nuclear in surance from the point of view of industry in insurance for mucilear establishments, Vienna, 1970.

- Kovar (R), Les accords conclus au sujet du et lavesponsabilite civil des exploitants de navires nucleairs, 1965.

- Lambert fairre's (Evolution La responsabilite civil d'une dette de responsabilite anne creance dindemnis, 1987.

- Lasurtegui (A), Les aspects Juridiques de l'utilisation des Sources de rayonnements ionis ants, 1971.

- Marrone (J), Current problems raised by insuvance of the muclear risks, nuclear accidents, Liabilities and Guarantees, Helsionki, 1992.

- Mazeaud (H.L), Traite theorique et pratique de la responsabilite civil, Paris, 1958.

- Pierard (J.P), responsabilite civile energi atomique et droit compare, these, Bruxelles, 1963.

- Strok (P), Analysis of Principal Problems Solvespar for Maritime Transport of Substances Nuclear Air, Monaco, 1968.

Published

2023-11-05

How to Cite

Hanoun, D. N. G. (2023). The principle of legat focus within The scope of nuclear liability - Comparative study -. TIKRIT UNIVERSITY JOURNAL FOR RIGHTS, 7(4), 588–609. Retrieved from https://tujr.tu.edu.iq/index.php/home/article/view/83