The legal value of Security Council resolutions A study in the light of the provisions of the Charter and public international law

Abstract

The idea of the research is to clarify the legal status of the Security Council, and to indicate its great importance as one of the main organs of the United Nations, clarifying its great importance as the executive organ and the effective tool of the United Nations Organization, highlighting its membership in its permanent and temporary branches, its individual competencies and common functions, and how the dispute is presented to it in accordance with the provisions of the Charter. The nature of the resolutions and recommendations issued by it and their legal value, and this requires a statement of the extent to which the Security Council adheres to the substantive and Objective procedural conditions in issuing resolutions and the controls for their legitimacy, without any distinction between major countries and other medium and small countries, in the presence of an international system in which the balance of power is in control. The nature of the resolutions and recommendations issued by it and their legal value, and this requires a statement of the extent to which the Security Council adheres to the substantive and procedural conditions in issuing resolutions and the controls for their legality, and this is that there is no distinction between major countries and between medium and small countries. Under the existence of an international system, the balance of power is in control. This happens in accordance with the existence of an international system in which the balance of power is in control, namely, the five permanent members of the Security Council, which, according to the provisions of the Charter, have the right of veto for any decision that contradicts their international policies and their own interests, so it was necessary to discuss the abuse of use the right of veto, or excessive use of it without justification. The research concluded that it is necessary to reform the legal system of the Security Council in terms of redistribution of membership and the voting system, on the basis of the principle of equality of sovereignty among member states, which requires strenuous international efforts to carry out a difficult and difficult task, and an unattainable security, represented by amending the Charter of the United Nations.