The impact of discriminatory censorship on criminal judgment ( Comparative analytical study )

Abstract

Abstract: In order for the courts of discrimination to exercise their function of monitoring criminal judgments issued by the courts of the subject, the courts have obliged the courts of the subject to release the verdicts they issue, with the reasons for the ruling being given as a means by which the courts of cassation are able to monitor the conciliation of the judgment in terms of a sound, As well as the validity of the application of the law on them, and the safety of the procedures followed. When the Court of Cassation begins its function of monitoring criminal judgments, the effect of this control is in two main aspects: the first is the execution of the judgment; The Court of Cassation is not able to control the judgments and decisions of the lower courts by means of the provisions of these provisions in accordance with the discriminatory or optional discrimination, or that the Court of Cassation does not reach its control due to negligence, forgetfulness, or Has the right to challenge the use of this right, the law allowed it to do so by requiring any criminal action to audit the decisions and decisions of its own or at the request of the prosecution or any related.