Management's responsibility for failure to implement judicial rulings

Abstract

Abstract: There is no legal state except with effective and real judicial oversight over the administration’s work that evaluates it and compensates for the damages resulting from its work. The administration cannot be left without restrictions or controls that operate within the frameworks drawn for it; Because giving it the right to be free in its actions may lead to a violation of the principle of legality and the foundations upon which the state is based, as well as flagrant violations of the rights of individuals. Since the plaintiff hopes to obtain the judgment, he hopes to implement it and arrange the legal consequences resulting from it and the scientific results that follow, so the judgments have no value unless they are implemented. Since the administration has sufficient means that enable it to implement judicial rulings, the failure to implement on its part raises its responsibility on the basis of the proven error in the refusal. Its responsibility is raised on the basis of responsibility without error in the case that if the abstention is outside the capacity of the administration because of a public burden imposed on everyone, then it is justice to compensate and compensate the damages that affect individuals because of this accident on the basis of equality before the public burdens, there is no escape from the responsibility of the administration to refrain, whether on the basis of The basis of error and without error, and many countries have guaranteed the administration’s responsibility for abstaining, but the matter is not related to the inclusion of the texts only, but rather to their effectiveness and the actual application of the provisions that determine the administration’s responsibility, because they are considered reparation for the damages resulting from the refrain and are not a sufficient guarantee for the implementation of the judicial ruling.