The legal value of recognition as a single evidence in criminal evidence is an analytical-comparative study

Abstract

   Set up a directory to commit someone for a certain crime punishable represents the burden falls on the prosecution authority and the criminal courts are based on specific evidence in the judgment, and that the recognition of the evidence which is considered optimal in the directory of proof, which may lead to a conviction of the accused. And it enjoys recognition as proof of great importance in the criminal case it is closely related to freedom of the individual and criminal justice has been accused of any kind of pressure to extract a confession exposed, which may result in the condemnation of an innocent person as if they were misused, or drop the defendant from punishment.

   The aim of the study in question is a statement over the admissibility as evidence of the recognition of a single reason for the rule. The limited scope of the research study and the recognition of the extent of the legal value if it is based upon a single judge as evidence in sentencing and what guarantees the recognition and the freedom of the judge in the criminal conviction of evidence generally recognize as proof solo especially for the issuance of the penal judgment. 

   The problem of freedom of research in the criminal conviction the judge the evidence and according to his discretion, especially on the subject of recognition of an individual as evidence and what are the safeguards prescribed by law for that particular he an exception to the general principle of the criminal prosecution .

   We will follow in the study of this research analytical comparative method, through the legal analysis of texts in order to reach the desired research results into two sections devote the first section to define the recognition and forms and conditions of authenticity and authority of the court in appreciation

under what title recognition and seek legal value for the recognition and guarantees and the authority of the judge in office building the recognition alone, in the second section and the title role of the recognition of an individual as evidence in criminal prosecution and finish Find a conclusion where we include what our findings, conclusions and recommendations.